Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/17/2009
Gersten v. Gersten
Citations
- 219 P.3d 309
- 223 Ariz. 99
- 570 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 21
- 2009 WL 3854335
- 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[P]ortions of the record not admitted in evidence at trial ha[ve] no evidentiary value unless they [a]re the proper subject of judicial notice.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timmer, Brown, Norris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-08-05· cited 120×
- In Re Marriage of PownallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-05-09· cited 111×
- United States v. LorenzettiSupreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 85×
- Marriage of Bugh v. BughCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-03-11· cited 68×
- Jurek v. JurekArizona Supreme Court· 1980-01-30· cited 58×
- State v. Old West Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-26· cited 36×
- Mathews v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-21· cited 32×
- Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-06-15· cited 30×
- In Re the Marriage of CuppCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-12-16· cited 24×
- Mergentime Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityD.C. Circuit· 1999-02-16· cited 23×
- Genoveva Canseco, as Widow and Personal Representative of the Estate of Fortino Canseco, and Legion Insurance Co. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1996-12-18· cited 22×
- Guerra v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-04-27· cited 18×
- In Re Estate of FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-12· cited 16×
- Edward W. Ostrowski v. The United States Department of Labor, Office of Workers Compensation ProgramsSixth Circuit· 1981-07-02· cited 14×
- Provinzano v. ProvinzanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-08-30· cited 9×
- In Re the Marriage of GeigleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-09· cited 9×
- In Re the Marriage of KellsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-01-31· cited 6×
- Mendoza v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-03-08· cited 5×
- Ferrer v. FerrerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.