Gershon v. Broomfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The prosecutor’s duty is to assist the grand jury in its investigations; the prosecutor may not exercise dominion over those investigations by evading the grand jury’s will.”
• \The prosecutor's duty is to assist the grand jury in its investigations; the prosecutor may not exercise dominion over those investigations by evading the grand jury's will.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michael Lacey v. Joseph Arpaio
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 4,653×
• Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-08-03· cited 49×
• Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-28· cited 28×
• Maretick v. Jarrett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-01-21· cited 22×
• Trebus v. Davis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1997-08-19· cited 22×
• Fund Manager v. Corbin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-03-13· cited 18×
• Francis v. Sanders
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-09-10· cited 16×
• State v. Quijada
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2019-03-28· cited 15×
• Riley v. Cornerstone Community Outreach, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2010-05-21· cited 12×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-03-13· cited 9×
• State v. Doolittle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-08-11· cited 3×
• Steiger v. Woods
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-18

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Calandra
  Supreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
• United States v. Ernest Raymond Basurto
  Ninth Circuit· 1974-07-19· cited 264×
• In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. In Re Jacqueline Schofield, Witness
  Third Circuit· 1973-09-11· cited 240×
• Lupo v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-10· cited 153×
• United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220
  Third Circuit· 1976-08-10· cited 151×
• United States v. Alfred Joseph Samango
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-12-13· cited 143×
• Andrew T. Durbin v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1954-11-04· cited 51×
• United States v. Kleen Laundry & Cleaners, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1974-08-09· cited 43×
• Arizona State Land Department v. McFate
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-01-27· cited 38×
• Marston's, Inc. v. Strand
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-01-21· cited 33×
• In Re Peart
  California Court of Appeal· 1935-03-22· cited 20×
• Amphitheater Unified School District 10 v. Harte
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-02-13· cited 18×