Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 10/27/2009

George v. Smith

Citations

  • 586 F.3d 479
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 23606
  • 2009 WL 3428834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e hesitate to apply a stricter standard of review without a clearer indication that Wisconsin fully considered [petitioner’s] claim on the merits.”
  • “We are . . . not going to displace Wisconsin’s interpretation of its own law with our own . . . .”
  • \Speculation based on hindsight\ insufficient to show ineffective assistance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Evans, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.