Gengnagel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding allegation that defendant’s exposure of his genitals was reckless because he exposed his 3 genitals to another person was insufficient to satisfy article 21.15
• holding information insufficient by failing to allege “any act or circumstances” to show exposure was done in a reckless manner
• referring to a “fundamentally defective” charging instrument
• referring to a \fundamentally defective\ charging instrument
• referring to a “fundamentally defective” charging instrument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).