Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/10/1988
Gengnagel v. State
Citations
- 748 S.W.2d 227
- 1988 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
- 1988 WL 8334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding allegation that defendant’s exposure of his genitals was reckless because he exposed his 3 genitals to another person was insufficient to satisfy article 21.15
- holding information insufficient by failing to allege “any act or circumstances” to show exposure was done in a reckless manner
- referring to a “fundamentally defective” charging instrument
- referring to a \fundamentally defective\ charging instrument
- referring to a “fundamentally defective” charging instrument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, McCormick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 503×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-28· cited 257×
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-10-19· cited 182×
- DeDonato v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 111×
- State v. MurkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-04-17· cited 89×
- Ex Parte BristerTexas Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 83×
- Cruz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-01-27· cited 67×
- Galliford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-02-20· cited 59×
- Sanchez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-10-12· cited 49×
- Bartlett v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-03-26· cited 40×
- Stadt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-10-09· cited 39×
- State v. McCoyTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-07-26· cited 27×
- Studer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1988-12-07· cited 22×
- State v. EmanuelTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-03-03· cited 17×
- Warren v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1989-01-26· cited 16×
- Hankins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-22· cited 13×
- State v. VasquezTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-11-08· cited 11×
- Boyd v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2007-02-07· cited 10×
- State v. RodgersTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2006-12-21· cited 9×
- Vasquez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-12-15· cited 6×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- American Plant Food Corporation v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 339×
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-06-11· cited 148×
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-07-20· cited 63×
- Townsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-07-07· cited 35×
- Arredondo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-20· cited 26×
- Crume v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-19· cited 21×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-16· cited 16×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-03-01· cited 15×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-04-07· cited 15×
- Short v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-02-24· cited 11×
- R---M---G v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1986-05-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.