Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/5/1995

Geimer v. Chicago Park District

Citations

272 Ill. App. 3d 629
650 N.E.2d 585
208 Ill. Dec. 891
1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

no duty upon park district to anticipate and prevent intentional misconduct of football player absent unique knowledge
park district, as landowner, did not have duty to prevent a third party’s intentional misconduct because the park district had no unique knowledge regarding the possible future attack
park district had no common-law duty to supervise student who hit plaintiff over the head with hockey stick (citing Thornburg v. Crystal Lake Park District, 171 Ill. App. 3d 329, 333 (1988))
park district had no common-law duty to supervise student who hit plaintiff over the head with hockey stick (citing Thornburg v. Crystal Lake Park District, 171 Ill. App. 3d 329, 333 (1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.