Skip to main content
· 11/26/1991

Marriage of Ross v. Ross

Citations

  • 477 N.W.2d 753
  • 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 1083
  • 1991 WL 246913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidentiary hearings are strongly encouraged in the face of allegations of present endangerment
  • stating that “the legislature likely intended to demand a showing of a significant degree of danger”
  • stating that de novo review is appropriate when the district court makes no findings of fact and the appellate court is presented with the same evidence presented to the district court
  • remanding for hearing despite affidavit asserting that child’s preference resulted from desire to live with more lenient parent
  • “Foster children past the age of majority in situations comparable to that of Michael Park must be protected by separate insurance contracts.”
  • “The choice of an older teenage child is 5 an overwhelming consideration in determining the child’s custody.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klaphake, Randall, Crippen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.