S.D. New York· 8/22/2013
Ge Dandong v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.
Citations
- 966 F. Supp. 2d 374
- 2013 WL 4482509
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining under law of the case doctrine to revisit arguments rejected by transferring judge in earlier ruling
- “Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
- “To be sure, Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
- weighing the use of a bank account as a contact
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Furman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 4,118×
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Second Circuit· 2007-04-06· cited 1,966×
- D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerSecond Circuit· 2006-09-05· cited 1,492×
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 1,211×
- Lerner v. Fleet Bank, N.A.Second Circuit· 2006-08-08· cited 714×
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Second Circuit· 1990-04-27· cited 663×
- Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLCSecond Circuit· 2010-08-05· cited 661×
- Best Van Lines, Inc. v. Tim Walker, Docket No. 04-3924-CvSecond Circuit· 2007-06-26· cited 536×
- Dorchester Financial Securities, Inc. v. Banco BRJ, S.A.Second Circuit· 2013-07-03· cited 499×
- Licci Ex Rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SALSecond Circuit· 2012-03-05· cited 475×
- Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American BuddhaSecond Circuit· 2010-06-15· cited 464×
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Second Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 319×
- In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 (Asat Trust Reg.)Second Circuit· 2013-04-16· cited 289×
- Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & RodriguezSecond Circuit· 2002-09-20· cited 278×
- Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Montana Board of InvestmentsNew York Court of Appeals· 2006-06-06· cited 216×
- Faulkner v. BeerSecond Circuit· 2006-09-08· cited 207×
- Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SALNew York Court of Appeals· 2012-11-20· cited 189×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.