Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 8/22/2013

Ge Dandong v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd.

Citations

  • 966 F. Supp. 2d 374
  • 2013 WL 4482509
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining under law of the case doctrine to revisit arguments rejected by transferring judge in earlier ruling
  • “Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
  • “To be sure, Plaintiffs cannot obtain double recovery for the same injury; but that prospect can be addressed at a later stage of the case, if necessary.”
  • weighing the use of a bank account as a contact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Furman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.