· 6/30/1987
Gates v. Superior Court
Citations
- 193 Cal. App. 3d 205
- 238 Cal. Rptr. 592
- 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1885
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ Hie civil provisions of the INA constitute a pervasive regulatory scheme such as to grant exclusive federal jurisdiction over immigration, thereby preempting state enforcement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klein, Danielson, Arabian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.