Gaskin v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• swimming pool enclosure ordered removed after court determined community’s interest in historical architectural integrity far outweighed hardship to defendants
• swimming pool enclosure ordered removed after court determined community's interest in historical architectural integrity far outweighed hardship to defendants
• in absence of a change of condition, covenant containing architectural restriction was enforceable and did not require a balancing of hardships where the relative hardship to the defendant was far outweighed by the benefits to the community affected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilcox v. Timberon Protective Association
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-12-20· cited 38×
• Cafeteria Operators, L.P. v. Coronado-Santa Fe Associates
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-10-10· cited 26×
• Cunningham v. Gross
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-05-17· cited 25×
• Chapman v. Jesco, Inc.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-09-23· cited 17×
• Chavira v. Gaylord Broadcasting Co.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-10-28· cited 11×
• Young v. TORTOISE ISLAND HOMEOWNER'S
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-23· cited 9×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Montoya v. Barreras
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-08-10· cited 47×
• Van Orman v. Nelson
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-04-10· cited 46×
• Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing Company
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-05-23· cited 44×
• State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Pelletier
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-07-18· cited 22×
• Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District v. Crabtree
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-09-14· cited 7×