District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/17/1985

Gary v. United States

Citations

499 A.2d 815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

when rule is new, reliance on old practice carries \common sense presumption of reasonableness\ unless new rule had been foreshadowed
only two prospective jurors questioned at the bench actually served on panel, and defense counsel did not use one peremptory strike
only two prospective jurors questioned at the bench actually served on panel, and defense counsel did not use one peremptory strike
“the issue remains one of ‘legislative intent but the presumption is in favor of severability.’”
one house veto over enactments
one house veto over enactments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Belson, Pryor, Nebeker, MacK, Newman, Ferren, Bel-Son, Terry, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gary v. United States

20 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.