Sun Dun, Inc. of Washington v. Coca-Cola Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an attempt to allege the necessary market power by aggregating the market power of several defendants is mere tautology”
• indicating that, “in order to sustain a charge of monopolization or attempted monopolization, a plaintiff must allege the necessary market domination of a particular defendant”
• dismissing monopolization and attempted monopolization claims alleging a shared monopoly theory of liability
• dismissing monopolization and attempted monopolization claims alleging a shared monopoly theory of liability
• allegation that two competitors conspired to monopolize a market through horizontal arrangements is more appropriately deemed an allegation of oligopoly which is not actionable under Section 2
• “Allegations that a group of defendants together possess dominant market power may state a Section 1 claim of oligopoly, but ... ‘an oligopoly, or shared monopoly, does not in itself violate Section 2 of the Sherman Act.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).