· 10/31/2006
Gary Mitchell v. Hillsborough County
Citations
- 468 F.3d 1276
- 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 457
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27058
- 2006 WL 3071412
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the standard of review applicable under a similar federal statute
- discussing the standard of review applicable under a similar federal statute
- “Content is undoubtedly the most important factor in assessing whether particular speech touches on a matter of public concern.”
- “Thus, if [the plaintiff’s] speech, when context, form and motivation are weighed, truly did act as a satire or parody, and the point of that satire or parody was to express a viewpoint in the Public Access debate, the speech could touch on a matter of public concern.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Kravitch, Jordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.