UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Megatrux Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Carmack Amendment does not preempt an indemnity claim for attorneys’ fees arising out of a contract between a broker and a carrier
• recognizing that rate to which carrier agrees was “premised on full liability”
• creating a four-part test for a carrier to effectively limit its liability under the Carmack Amendment
• characterizing “the preemptive effect of the Carmack Amendment [as] quite broad”
• “[W]e may affirm the dismissal of a complaint on any ground supported by the record even if that ground was not considered by the district court.”
• “Enforcement of a self-imposed undertaking poses no risk of patchwork regulation or different demands in different jurisdictions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).