Skip to main content
· 2/26/1974

Garrison v. Rohm & Haas Co.

Citations

  • 492 F.2d 346
  • 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 9892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing a situation in which a corporate decision to dispose of excess land “drove the real estate decision” and may have resulted in a sale below the maximum price attainable
  • discussing the significance of the highest and best use of comparable sales
  • distinguishing between sales to owner-users and sales to investors for multi-tenant occupancy
  • describing a supply and demand analysis for a proposed residential subdivision
  • describing the substantial difference between the rents the appraisers for both parties used when valuing the same building at a highest and best use of single tenant occupancy and the rents they used for a highest and best use of multi-tenant occupancy
  • “plaintiff must present evidence sufficient to demonstrate that the appeal is based on sound theory and objective data rather than on mere wishful thinking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.