Linda Thompson and Roy Hedbert v. Hirano Tecseed Company, Ltd. v. Sheldahl, Inc., Third-Party

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that summary judgment was inappropriate because there was a material question of fact as to whether the defendant participated in designing the component part it supplied
• defective design claims require that the product “was in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous for its intended use,” that “the defect existed when” the product left the maker’s control, and that “the defect proximately caused [the] injury.
• defective design claims require that the product “was in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous for its intended use,” that “the defect existed when” the product left the maker’s control, and that “the defect proximately caused [the] injury.
• defective design claims require that the product “was in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous for its intended use,” that “the defect existed when” the product left the maker’s control, and that “the defect proximately caused [the] injury.
• defective design claims require that the product “was in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous for its intended use,” that “the defect existed when” the product left the maker’s control, and that “the defect proximately caused [the] injury.
• defective design claims require that the product “was in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous for its intended use,” that “the defect existed when” the product left the maker’s control, and that “the defect proximately caused [the] injury.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).