Indiana Court of Appeals· 3/7/2012
Garrett v. State
Citations
- 964 N.E.2d 855
- 2012 WL 727272
- 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is the element of intent to deliver that distinguishes dealing in methamphetamine from the lesser-included offense of possession of methamphetamine”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-11-17· cited 328×
- Champlain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-06-13· cited 71×
- Scisney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-11-02· cited 66×
- Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-05-13· cited 60×
- Ortiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-04-22· cited 56×
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-16· cited 45×
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-11-20· cited 25×
- McDowell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2008-05-15· cited 13×
- Burgin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-02-25· cited 13×
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-07· cited 11×
- Turner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-06-18· cited 10×
- Porter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-09-30· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.