Garcia v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a new trial in the interest of justice was warranted because the defendant’s alibi was paramount to the trial and, most notably, the defendant, with “cavalier and misguided” intentions, did not disclose the identity of the true perpetrators
• controversy was not fully tried when material evidence as to the defendant's identification was not presented to the jury, warranting a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. MacHner
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1979-10-12· cited 793×
• State v. Wyss
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 164×
• Morden v. Continental AG
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2000-06-16· cited 159×
• Rogers v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-02-07· cited 44×
• Grube v. Daun
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1997-11-12· cited 36×
• State v. Ruiz
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 27×
• State v. Boyce
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-02-01· cited 24×
• State v. Horenberger
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-06-20· cited 20×
• State v. D'ACQUISTO
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 14×
• State v. Shaw
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1985-04-25· cited 9×
• State v. Repp
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1983-12-27· cited 8×
• Vollmer v. Luety
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1989-05-11· cited 7×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones (George Michael) v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1975-09-30· cited 37×
• State v. Elson
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-06-29· cited 30×