Skip to main content
· 10/12/1979

State v. MacHner

Citations

  • 285 N.W.2d 905
  • 92 Wis. 2d 797
  • 1979 Wisc. App. LEXIS 2758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \it is a prerequisite to a claim of ineffective representation on appeal to preserve the testimony of trial counsel\
  • holding that without a hearing to preserve the testimony of trial counsel as to the claimed ineffective assistance, a court cannot grant a new trial
  • holding that an evidentiary hearing in which trial counsel testifies is \a prerequisite to a claim of ineffective representation on appeal\
  • holding that an evidentiary hearing “preserv[ing] the testimony of trial counsel” was a prerequisite to an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
  • holding that a Wisconsin court cannot grant relief on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim unless it holds a hearing at which counsel testifies
  • holding that a postconviction, evidentiary hearing at which trial counsel explains \the reasons underlying his handling of a case\ is \a prerequisite to a claim of ineffective representation on appeal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Decker, Moser, Cannon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.