Ganther v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when part of the McCarter test is satisfied, appellate court need not address the remaining prong
• when part of the McCarter test is satisfied, appellate court need not address the remaining prong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tamez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-08-31· cited 109×
• Dhillon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-06-22· cited 54×
• Thacker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-29· cited 50×
• Hart v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-08-24· cited 47×
• Gemoets v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-08-09· cited 13×
• DeJesus v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-22· cited 8×
• Timothy Dean Stone v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-03-10
• Stow Kingdon Hart v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-08-24
• Dhillon, Baljinder Singh v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-06-22
• Jose Arredondo v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2010-01-29
• Jeff Clay Everitt v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2017-08-08