Skip to main content

Gann v. State

Citations

  • 550 N.E.2d 803
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 222
  • 1990 WL 18416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where the facts pleaded raise an issue of merit, summary disposition is erroneous, agreeing with the petitioner that the pleadings raised a genuine question of material fact, and remanding for further proceedings
  • “Where ineffectiveness of counsel is alleged, and the facts pleaded raise an issue of merit, then summary disposition is erroneous. The State’s general denial to Gann’s petition was not sufficient to invalidate the petition. Further proceedings are required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conover, Chezem, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.