Skip to main content

Clayton v. State

Citations

  • 673 N.E.2d 783
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1601
  • 1996 WL 682393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an evidentiary hearing was required where ineffective assistance of counsel was alleged and the facts pled raised an issue of possible merit
  • determining that the post-conviction court did not err when it summarily disposed of the plaintiff's claim regarding his entitlement to an advisement by the trial court because the claim was a question of law
  • where facts pled raise issue of possible merit, summary disposition erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Sharpnack, Chezem

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.