Gamble v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating \our courts have a duty to consider subsequent legislation in arriving at a correct interpretation of a prior statute\
• \[O]ur courts have a duty to consider subsequent legislation in arriving at a correct interpretation of a prior statute.\
• \[O]ur courts have a duty to consider subsequent legislation in arriving at a correct interpretation of a prior statute.\
• courts should consider subsequent legislation in arriving at a correct interpretation of a prior statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Foster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-24· cited 18×
• GEL Corp. v. Dept. of Environmental Protection
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-04· cited 10×
• Barns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-27· cited 8×
• Burgos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-09-06· cited 7×
• Martin Daytona v. Strickland Const. Serv.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-17· cited 6×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25· cited 4×
• Estate of Vazquez v. Avante Groups, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-20· cited 1×
• Asbell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ivey v. Chicago Ins. Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-02-11· cited 27×
• Ducharme v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-02· cited 9×
• Goodwin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-26· cited 5×
• Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure re Sentencing Guidelines
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-26· cited 3×