Skip to main content
· 8/23/2013

Galvez v. Aspen Corp.

Citations

  • 967 F. Supp. 2d 615
  • 2013 WL 4516762
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that court’s local rule allowing for sur-replies when there are new arguments or evidence presented in a reply brief
  • noting that the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana has a local rule allowing for sur-replies when there are new arguments or evidence presented in a reply brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kuntz, Tomlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.