Galleher v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Plaintiff stated a money-mandating claim for post allowance under 5 U.S.C. § 5924 and section 220 of the DSSR
• holding that Plaintiff stated a money-mandating claim for post allowance under 5 U.S.C. § 5924(1) and section 220 of the DSSR
• “Equitable tolling of § 2501 is now foreclosed by binding precedent, as are similar arguments based on the doctrines of estoppel and waiver.”
• “Equitable tolling of § 2501 is now foreclosed by binding precedent, as are similar arguments based on the doctrines of estoppel and waiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).