New Mexico Supreme Court· 2/10/1992
Gallegos v. State
Citations
- 825 P.2d 1249
- 113 N.M. 339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the purpose of the Rule 5-608(D) language \is to allow the court an opportunity to decide a question whose dimensions are not open to conjecture or after-the-fact interpretation\
- concluding that the purpose of the Rule 5-608(D) language “is to allow the court an opportunity to decide a question whose dimensions are not open to conjecture or after-the-fact interpretation”
- holding that a 11 defendant may offer a modified uniform jury instruction on a lesser-included offense 12 and, “[i]f the court believes no modification is appropriate, the court should instruct 13 in the exact language of the uniform jury instruction”
- “The party requesting the modification can preserve error by alerting the mind of the court to any vice claimed to be present in the uniform jury instruction.”
- \The party requesting the modification can preserve error by alerting the mind of the court to any vice claimed to be present in the uniform jury instruction.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ransom, Baca, Franchini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-09-03· cited 228×
- Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-03-01· cited 142×
- State v. JerniganNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-12-16· cited 91×
- State v. VillaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-09-09· cited 72×
- State v. HillNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-10-04· cited 62×
- State v. GaitanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-02-22· cited 55×
- State v. DiazNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-10-30· cited 47×
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-07-02· cited 46×
- State v. CavanaughNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-12-06· cited 29×
- State v. BadoniNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-11-27· cited 19×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-03-06· cited 17×
- Kennedy v. Dexter Consolidated SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-04-02· cited 8×
- State v. DENZEL B.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-05-07· cited 7×
- State v. VillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-12-02· cited 5×
- State v. GalindoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2023-12-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.