Skip to main content

Gallegos v. State

Citations

  • 825 P.2d 1249
  • 113 N.M. 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the purpose of the Rule 5-608(D) language \is to allow the court an opportunity to decide a question whose dimensions are not open to conjecture or after-the-fact interpretation\
  • concluding that the purpose of the Rule 5-608(D) language “is to allow the court an opportunity to decide a question whose dimensions are not open to conjecture or after-the-fact interpretation”
  • holding that a 11 defendant may offer a modified uniform jury instruction on a lesser-included offense 12 and, “[i]f the court believes no modification is appropriate, the court should instruct 13 in the exact language of the uniform jury instruction”
  • “The party requesting the modification can preserve error by alerting the mind of the court to any vice claimed to be present in the uniform jury instruction.”
  • \The party requesting the modification can preserve error by alerting the mind of the court to any vice claimed to be present in the uniform jury instruction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ransom, Baca, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.