Gallant v. Gallant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permanent alimony should be commensurate with wife's needs and husband's ability to pay
• permanent alimony should be commensurate with wife’s needs and husband’s ability to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-03· cited 28×
• Maddux v. Maddux
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-08· cited 23×
• Carroll v. Carroll
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-07-02· cited 21×
• Anderson v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-12· cited 6×
• Laurenzo v. Laurenzo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-04-12· cited 4×
• Franco v. Franco
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-09· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Walter v. Walter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-02-14· cited 69×
• Desilets v. Desilets
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-11-30· cited 33×
• B & L MOTORS, INC. v. Bignotti
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-11· cited 27×
• Ramsey v. Ramsey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-11· cited 13×
• Lewis v. Lewis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-25· cited 8×
• Orr v. Orr
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-24· cited 5×
• Lopez v. Lopez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-11-29· cited 3×