Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/28/2013

Gallagher v. United States

Citations

  • 711 F.3d 315
  • 2013 WL 1235668
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying successive § 2255 motion to the extent it \presents the same claim presented in the first . . . § 2255 motion\
  • denying successive § 2255 motion to the extent it \presents the same claim presented in the first . . . § 2255 motion\
  • “Neither Lafler nor Frye announced a new rule of constitutional law: Both are applications of [Strickland].”
  • “Neither Lafler nor [Missouri v Frye, 566 US 134 (2012)] announced ‘a new rule of constitutional law’: Both are applications of Strickland”
  • applying section 2244(b) to a successive section 2255 petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Cabranes, Wesley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.