Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/22/1980

Galef v. Alexander

Citations

  • 615 F.2d 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • intimating that a director is “interested” for purposes of overriding directors’ refusal of plaintiffs’ Rule 23.1, demand and exercise of business judgment to terminate derivative lawsuit only if he authorized or participated in the alleged wrongdoing
  • discussing with apparent approval rationale of cases holding that demand must be made even where all directors have been named as defendants
  • “[T]here appears to be alleged a sufficient causal link between the claimed nondisclosures in the proxy statements and the elections which the statements sought to influence.” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.