Skip to main content
· 3/31/2022

Galavich v. Hales

Citations

  • 187 N.E.3d 664
  • 2022 Ohio 1121

Syllabus

Express trust created Letter showed intent, named beneficiary, and property Judicial estoppel forecloses collection under trust because did not inform the bankruptcy court property was being held for his benefit, i.e. the trust, instead stated disinherited.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • shifting rationale for board's decision reinforced conclusion that decision was arbitrary and capricious
  • where there is no evidentiary support for a commission decision, the decision is arbitrary and capricious
  • application consideration encompasses \wide range of factors\ including \the reputation of the applicant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.