Skip to main content
· 12/21/1979

Fye v. Central Transportation Inc.

Citations

  • 409 A.2d 2
  • 487 Pa. 137
  • 1979 Pa. LEXIS 752
  • 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,551
  • 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is clear from the legislation that the General Assembly was of the view that the procedures provided by the [PHRA] represented the most effective approach to the problem of discrimination.”
  • \It is clear from the legislation that the General Assembly was of the view that the procedures provided by the [PHRA] represented the most effective approach to the problem of discrimination.\
  • “It is clear from the legislation that the General Assembly was of the view that the procedures provided by the [PHRA] represented the most effective approach to the problem of discrimination.”
  • “If the General Assembly wished to permit the substitution of agencies in its legislative scheme, it could have easily provided that result.”
  • “EEOC procedures are not a sufficient surrogate for PHRC remedies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Nix, Manderino, Larsen, Flaherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.