Frink v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to reverse for technical error where “the purpose of the oath requirement was fulfilled”
• insufficient evidence to sustain conviction for driving with a suspended license when defendant's record showed the period of suspension had elapsed by the time of the traffic stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-27· cited 12×
• Kelly v. Smith
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-03-26· cited 5×
• State v. Resendiz-Fortanel
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1998-05-29· cited 3×
• Richard Bernard Sansbury v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-12-11· cited 1×
• Omid Petrelli v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-10-11
• United States v. Turner
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-12-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wiseheart v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-04-28· cited 86×
• Hammons v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-09-02· cited 24×
• Baldock v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-08-23· cited 15×
• State v. Martin
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-11-14· cited 6×
• Jones v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-09-10· cited 5×
• State v. Dyson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1988-02-01· cited 3×