· 6/10/1993
Friddle v. Epstein
Citations
- 16 Cal. App. 4th 1649
- 21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 85
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 8824
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5259
- 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the right to recover statutory damages “accrue[s] at the moment the Privacy Act was violated”
- focusing on whether evidence indicated parties desired confidentiality
- focusing on whether evidence indicated parties desired confidentiality
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Poche
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.