Frio v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that record producer could testify about conversations he took part in even though they were illegally recorded
• holding that record producer could testify about conversations he took part in even though they were illegally recorded
• affirming exclusion. of notes of illegally taped phone conversations, but issuing writ of mandamus to allow testimony based on recollection refreshed by said notes
• “Nothing in the Privacy Act can be read so as to conclude a party whose confidential communications have been recorded gains greater protection than if they had not been so intercepted.”
• remanding, in civil case, for determination whether witness who had reviewed illegally obtained recording and notes of same prior to trial enjoyed present recollection of recorded events
• rejecting petitioner's argument that \business communications lack confidentiality\ as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).