Freeman v. Cherokee Water Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding Section 16.069 did not apply because counterclaims based on the alleged fraudulent execution of a deed did not logically relate to plaintiffs declaratory action to construe a fishing rights provision contained in the deed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).