Gerber v. Holcomb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “‘Generally, a consent judgment operates as res adjudicata to the same extent as a judgment on the merits.’”
• “„Generally, a consent judgment operates as res adjudicata to the same extent as a judgment on the merits.‟”
• “The doctrine of res judicata only requires that there be ‘a full and fair opportunity to litigate all issues arising out of’ the claim, W.G. Myers v. Olson, 100 N.M. 745, 676 P.2d 822, 824 (1984) (emphasis added
• “ ‘The [res judicata] bar of the judgment in such cases extends not only to matters actually determined, but also to other matters which in the exercise of due diligence could have been presented for determination in the prior action.’ ”
• consent judgment operated as an adjudication on the merits
• consent judgment operated as an adjudication on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).