Freelander v. G. & K. REALTY CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that when “[t]here is nothing ambiguous in [a contract’s] language ... [a] court cannot subvert its plain meaning”
• observing that when \[t]here is nothing ambiguous in [a contract's] language . . . [a] court cannot subvert its plain meaning\
• where the language of a contract is not ambiguous, the words will be given their plain meaning
• “When the words of the contract are not ambiguous, the contract will be enforced according to its terms”
• contracts that are free from ambiguity must be interpreted according to their plain terms
• whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law for the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).