Fairfield 274-278 Clarendon Trust v. Robert M. Dwek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Evidence of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements cannot be admitted to vary or modify the terms of an unambiguous written contract.”
• “Evidence of prior or contemporaneous oral agreements cannot be admitted to vary or modify the terms of an unambiguous written contract.”
• agreements generally presumed to express the intent of the parties
• agreements generally presumed to express intent of the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).