Skip to main content
· 10/18/2002

Freedom Ring Communications, LLC v. AT & T CORP.

Citations

  • 229 F. Supp. 2d 67
  • 2002 DNH 189
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20995
  • 2002 WL 31426381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that claim that defendant has been unjustly enriched because it failed to pay plaintiff for services rendered under its filed tariffs is barred under the filed rate doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbadoro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.