Suzanne Cahnmann, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Sprint Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the effect of contract action is to challenge tariff, the action arises under federal law
• holding that preemption applied where the \relief sought by the fraud counts is identical to that sought by the contract count\
• holding that where the effect of contract action is to challenge tariff, the action arises under federal law
• holding that preemption applied where the “relief sought by the fraud counts is identical to that sought by the contract count”
• holding that state law contract action on a promotional sale offered by Sprint Corporation was preempted by the Communication Act’s administrative and judicial review scheme
• deciding that because “in this case ‘fraud’ is just another name for ‘breach of contract,’” plaintiffs’ fraud claim was preempted for the same reasons as their contract claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).