Skip to main content
· 12/24/1975

Freedman v. Beneficial Corp.

Citations

  • 406 F. Supp. 917
  • 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “mere labeling of an action as one in the nature of quasi contract is not enough to avoid the impact of the statute of limitations”
  • “The quasi contract was developed by the law courts as a device for creating a ‘contract’ to remedy the absence of mutual promises under circumstances where it is necessary to preclude the unjust retention of an advantage or benefit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Latchum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.