· 12/24/1975
Freedman v. Beneficial Corp.
Citations
- 406 F. Supp. 917
- 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “mere labeling of an action as one in the nature of quasi contract is not enough to avoid the impact of the statute of limitations”
- “The quasi contract was developed by the law courts as a device for creating a ‘contract’ to remedy the absence of mutual promises under circumstances where it is necessary to preclude the unjust retention of an advantage or benefit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Latchum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.