Wyoming Supreme Court· 2/15/2007

Frederick v. State

Citations

2007 WY 27
151 P.3d 1136
2007 Wyo. LEXIS 26
2007 WL 470531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing courts must provide the defendant an opportunity to withdraw a rejected sentence specific plea deal
“When a discrepancy exists between the oral pronouncement and the written order, the oral pronouncement prevails.”
“Due process requires that sentence be imposed only on accurate information.” (citing Manes, ¶ 9, 92 P.3d at 292)
“Frederick does not challenge the accuracy of the evidence, only that it was a factor in sentencing.”
“A recommendation under W.R.Cr.P. 11(e)(1)(B) is not binding on the court, and the defendant does not have the right to withdraw the plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Golden, Hill, Kite, Park, Voigt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.