Fred Meyer Stores v. Godfrey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implicit within board’s statutory grant of authority “is the authority to determine what circumstances will suffice to preserve an issue before the board”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marsh v. Saif Corp. (In re Comp. of Marsh)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-05-15
• Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Schwanenberg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-08
• Frazer v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-05-18

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 55×
• Peiffer v. Hoyt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-30· cited 40×
• J. Arlie Bryant, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Commission
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-02-01· cited 39×
• Brewer v. Department of Fish & Wildlife
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-10· cited 30×
• Godfrey v. Fred Meyer Stores
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-23· cited 21×
• Marvin Wood Products v. Callow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-22· cited 19×
• Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-19· cited 17×
• Wahlgren v. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-08· cited 13×
• SAIF Corp. v. Donahue-Birran
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-08· cited 13×
• Mershon v. Oregonian Publishing
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-26· cited 11×
• SAIF Corp. v. Kurcin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 8×
• Christensen v. Cober
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-12· cited 6×
• In re the Marriage of Westendorf
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 5×
• Fraser v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-12· cited 2×