Oregon Supreme Court· 12/19/1991
Booth v. Tektronix, Inc.
Citations
- 823 P.2d 402
- 312 Or. 463
- 1991 Ore. LEXIS 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, when the legislature has delegated authority to an agency to define policy by promulgating rules, a court’s review of the board’s exercise of that authority is “largely deferential”
- holding that, when the legislature has delegated authority to an agency to define policy by promulgating rules, a court's review of the board's exercise of that authority is \largely deferential\
- explaining that the workers' compensation system was created to \streamline the process by which injured workers could be paid for compensable injuries\ and declining to preclude employer-physician communication when the legislature did not expressly undertake to do so
- “Weighing of policy arguments [in the context of workers’ compensation law] is within the purview of the legislature, not the courts.”
- “Weighing of pol- icy arguments [in the context of workers’ compensation law] is within the purview of the legislature, not the courts.”
- uphold- ing the board’s authority and deferring to the board’s inter- pretation through its orders of its own rules concerning the admissibility of evidence resulting from prehearing commu- nication between defense counsel and the claimant’s treat- ing physician
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson, Carson, Jones, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-30· cited 51×
- Morris v. Consolidation Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1994-07-18· cited 34×
- SAIF Corp. v. TullCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-06-10· cited 13×
- Saif Corp. v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 9×
- Hadley v. Cody Hindman LoggingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-10-16· cited 8×
- Whitlock v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-17· cited 6×
- Brown v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-10· cited 4×
- Fred Meyer Stores v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 4×
- Zach v. Chartis Claims, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-07-20· cited 2×
- McGuire v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-16· cited 2×
- Brown v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-30
- Pease v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-06-22
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-12-16· cited 365×
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court· 1981-08-11· cited 139×
- Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-03· cited 120×
- Humphers v. First Interstate BankOregon Supreme Court· 1985-03-06· cited 87×
- University of Oregon Co-Operative Store v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 1975-11-20· cited 52×
- Smith v. Clackamas CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1969-01-14· cited 45×
- Cook v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-06· cited 27×
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 18×
- Mershon v. Oregonian PublishingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-26· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.