Eighth Circuit· 8/24/1994
Fred A. Hamilton v. Michael Groose
Citations
- 28 F.3d 859
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the petitioner’s request to represent himself was equivocal where he used ambiguous language and told the trial judge that he was “not very serious about wanting to represent” himself and that he was “not asking to proceed pro se totally”
- acknowledging that a defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel may be “both conditional and unequivocal,” and recognizing that such a waiver would be sufficient to invoke the right to self- representation under Faretta
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman, Hansen, Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 921×
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-02-27· cited 632×
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court· 1999-10-21· cited 217×
- Jerome Williams v. George Bartlett, Howard R. Relin, Monroe County District Attorney, Intervenor-Respondent-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1994-12-28· cited 142×
- United States v. George A. Webster, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1996-05-30· cited 123×
- United States v. John Vincent MacKovichTenth Circuit· 2000-04-25· cited 117×
- Commonwealth v. DavidoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-25· cited 114×
- Gary N. Fields v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Virginia Department of CorrectionsFourth Circuit· 1995-03-20· cited 103×
- William Allen Marshall v. Don Taylor, Warden Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 2005-01-13· cited 71×
- United States v. ProctorFirst Circuit· 1999-01-31· cited 69×
- United States v. AkersTenth Circuit· 2000-06-12· cited 64×
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri· 2007-05-29· cited 49×
- In Re Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 46×
- State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-08-20· cited 45×
- State v. RaterSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-07-23· cited 44×
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-12-23· cited 36×
- State of Missouri v. Tawanda KunongaMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-03-29· cited 35×
- State v. OchoaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-02-25· cited 28×
- State v. TorkelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-07-21· cited 25×
- Spencer v. AultN.D. Iowa· 1996-09-27· cited 23×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 2,073×
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
- Benjamin Adams v. Midge Carroll, WardenNinth Circuit· 1989-05-30· cited 205×
- United Dairymen of Arizona v. LaSalviaSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 89×
- Hiram Eugene Meyer v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsEighth Circuit· 1988-11-04· cited 85×
- Gregory Johnstone v. Walter J. Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, RespondentSecond Circuit· 1986-12-24· cited 78×
- Charles O. Reese v. Crispus C. NixEighth Circuit· 1991-08-22· cited 67×
- State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-05-09· cited 48×
- Michael Edward Carey v. State of MinnesotaEighth Circuit· 1985-07-05· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.