Skip to main content
· 11/4/1988

Hiram Eugene Meyer v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Arkansas Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 1110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that waiver of trial - counsel was knowing and intelligent, despite lack of Faretta warnings, where defendant understood his right to counsel and knew- of the dangers of self-representation
  • holding that a defendant’s decision to have counsel removed after being cautioned that no replacement counsel would be appointed was the functional equivalent of a voluntary waiver of right to counsel
  • deciding Meyer’s decision to seek removal of his court-appointed attorney after being advised another attorney would not be appointed for him was the functional equivalent of a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel
  • indicating the court favors “a specific warning on the record of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation” when a defendant seeks to proceed pro se
  • indicating the court favors “a specific warning on the record of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation” when a defendant seeks to proceed pro se
  • relying on instruction from probation revocation hearing to find that defendant understood his right to counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Bright, Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.