Skip to main content

Freas v. Archer Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 716 A.2d 998
  • 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 653
  • 1998 D.C. App. LEXIS 163
  • 1998 WL 557095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiff alleged facts demonstrating that he was discharged “in violation of a mandate explicitly set forth in [D.C.] law”
  • stating that \there is no need” to consider exception to at-will employment where statute allegedly violated \is explicit and may apply directly to [the employer’s] alleged [wrongful] discharge ....”
  • recognizing a claim for wrongful discharge in retaliation for filing a complaint alleging unlawful wage deductions under District of Columbia law
  • extending the exception to an at-will employee terminated for reporting an employer’s illegal conduct to the authorities
  • extending the exception to an at-will employee terminated for reporting an employer’s illegal conduct to the authorities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry, Farrell, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Freas v. Archer Services, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.