District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/24/1988
Franklin v. State
Citations
- 526 So. 2d 159
- 1988 WL 54214
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, without discussion or explanation, that the amended version of § 958.14 does not require a court to reclassify a defendant as a youthful offender after a violation of probation or community control
- trial court not required to “reclassify” a defendant as a youthful offender for resentencing upon a violation of probation or community control
- which did not involve a guideline departure problem
- review pending in supreme court, No. 72,488
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orfinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 288×
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-15· cited 101×
- Duncan v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-03-23· cited 47×
- State v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-03-15· cited 33×
- Watson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-08· cited 16×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-08· cited 15×
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-01-03· cited 14×
- Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-22· cited 12×
- Ruffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 12×
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-28· cited 11×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-15· cited 10×
- Hankey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-30· cited 9×
- Reams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-27· cited 9×
- Butler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-07· cited 7×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-30· cited 6×
- Heuring v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-10· cited 5×
- State v. HicksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-27· cited 5×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-18· cited 4×
- Lawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-01· cited 4×
- Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-09· cited 4×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
- State v. CauseySupreme Court of Florida· 1987-02-26· cited 441×
- Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'nSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-23· cited 274×
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-11-22· cited 199×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-01-14· cited 129×
- Florida Bar: Amendment to Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-08· cited 85×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-03· cited 22×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-10-08· cited 22×
- McKinley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-18· cited 15×
- Clarence Williams v. Louis L. Wainwright, as Secretary, Department of Offender RehabilitationFifth Circuit· 1981-07-06· cited 13×
- Poore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-05· cited 13×
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-25· cited 12×
- Wayne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 12×
- Crosby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-30· cited 11×
- State v. WestonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-14· cited 10×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-10· cited 8×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-21· cited 8×
- Cone v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.