Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fictional parties must be dismissed if discovery has failed to yield their identities
• holding that “a state statute cannot be applied so as to limit a federal court's supplemental jurisdiction”
• holding that “a state statute cannot be applied so as to limit a federal court’s supplemental jurisdiction.”
• holding that FIRREA’s anti-injunction provision “precludes a court order against a third party which would affect' the FDIC as receiver, particularly where the relief would have the same practical, result as an order directed against the FDIC in that capacity”
• finding that federal governmental entities are not “persons” subject to suit in a federal civil rights matter
• noting that finality of agency action is determined by its consequences or practical effects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).