Frank W. Whitcomb Construction Corp. v. Cedar Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• novation never presumed; must produce evidentiary support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1998-09-14· cited 273×
• Dj Painting, Inc. v. Baraw Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-05-11· cited 80×
• Morrisville Lumber Co., Inc. v. Okcuoglu
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-05-01· cited 51×
• Insulation Contracting & Supply v. Kravco, Inc.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-04-21· cited 30×
• Bashir v. Moayedi
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-07-12· cited 3×
• Berkshire Bank v. the Harvest Grille, Inc.
  Vermont Superior Court· 2018-11-20

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pioneer Credit Corporation v. Carden
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1968-06-04· cited 32×
• H. P. Hood & Sons v. Heins
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1964-12-01· cited 29×
• Pike Industries, Inc. v. Middlebury Associates
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1981-08-14· cited 17×
• Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. B. L. Allen, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-02-05· cited 16×
• Pike Industries, Inc. v. Middlebury Associates
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-01-11· cited 12×