Skip to main content
· 12/1/1964

H. P. Hood & Sons v. Heins

Citations

  • 205 A.2d 561
  • 124 Vt. 331
  • 1964 Vt. LEXIS 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A promise for a promise is adequate consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holden, Shangraw, Barney, Smith, Hill, Supr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.